voussoir
/
etiquette
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove Album improvements from readme. 

I forgot to do this during 30d8d08.
master
voussoir 2018-03-19 15:17:19 -07:00
parent b4cd4b6130
commit efd8e28c01
1 changed files with 0 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
README.md
View File

@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ Here is a brief overview of the project to help you learn your way around:
- Add a `Photo.merge` to combine duplicate entries. - Add a `Photo.merge` to combine duplicate entries.
- Generate thumbnails for vector files without falling victim to bombs. - Generate thumbnails for vector files without falling victim to bombs.
- Allow photos to have nonstandard, orderby-able properties like "release year". How? - Allow photos to have nonstandard, orderby-able properties like "release year". How?
- Improve the appearance of album page. Too many section headers and the "Create album" interface should allow giving a title immediately.
- When users have '%' or '#', etc. in their username, it is difficult to access their /user/ URL. I would prefer to fix it without simply blacklisting those characters. - When users have '%' or '#', etc. in their username, it is difficult to access their /user/ URL. I would prefer to fix it without simply blacklisting those characters.
- Currently, the Jinja templates are having a tangling influence on the backend objects, because Jinja cannot import my other modules like bytestring, but it can access the methods of the objects I pass into the template. As a result, the objects have excess helper methods. Consider making them into Jinja filters instead. Which is also kind of ugly but will move that pollution out of the backend at least. - Currently, the Jinja templates are having a tangling influence on the backend objects, because Jinja cannot import my other modules like bytestring, but it can access the methods of the objects I pass into the template. As a result, the objects have excess helper methods. Consider making them into Jinja filters instead. Which is also kind of ugly but will move that pollution out of the backend at least.
- Perhaps instead of actually deleting objects, they should just have a `deleted` flag, to make easy restoration possible. Also consider regrouping the children of restored Groupables if those children haven't already been reassigned somewhere else. - Perhaps instead of actually deleting objects, they should just have a `deleted` flag, to make easy restoration possible. Also consider regrouping the children of restored Groupables if those children haven't already been reassigned somewhere else.